<< Previous - The Rationale Behind Service
“I am Aware, I am Aware, I have awareness. What is this awareness? Oh! I
Am awareness. Then what is the need
to define it? ‘I’ define everything else. But how and why do I define that
which defines everything else?” a chain of thoughts once gushed. And
that was the beginning that changed everything forever. So many things that
were taken for granted, so many things that were ignored, surfaced from the
great depths.
I am alive, I am aware. I
accept that I am aware of my existence. Then do I know where does this
awareness spring from? What gives rise to this awareness? And first of all what
is awareness? Have scientists found any element or a combination of elements
that can become aware of itself? Can it be created in a lab by mixing some
things? Oh wait! Why do I need to search it outside? I AM THAT!! Why do I
forget this simple fact? Why do I have to search for awareness in a lab, when I
AM THAT myself? All I have to do is to search me! Oh wait! ‘I’ is searching for
‘I’? Are there two ‘I’s? One that searches and one that is being searched? Do I
have two awarenesses? It can’t be!
What is Self-Realization?
Realizing the Self. What is my Self? At this very moment, as I ask this
question, am I apart from my Self? Is the struggling Self different from the
Self to be realized? Is the questioning Self different from the Self that comes
as an answer? Do I have two Selfs? It can’t be. Then what is it that I am
struggling to attain? Self is struggling to attain its own Self?
And why didn’t I get this
simple question before? Oh! Because whenever I said ‘I’, immediately it was
associated with a lump of mass called body. I was content with an answer,
although it was wrong, and therefore I never tried to search further. If body
is the reason for the awareness, then there cannot be something called death.
My dead body should not allow others to burn it.
What? “I think, therefore I
am”? I exist because of thoughts? Hmm. But wait, I have a question. Suppose I
do not have any thoughts, so does it mean I am absent? Do I become non-existent
when I do not think? I have another question. I say ‘I Am’. But suppose I do
not know any language. Then how do I think to myself that ‘I Am’? Although the
words are absent, the feeling of existence is unbroken, isn’t it? ‘I Am’ are
just words, mere sounds without meaning. ‘I’ give meaning to them. ‘I Am’ is a
feeling, not mere sounds. It does not require a language for its existence. I
simply Am.
I witness everything. The
objects (including thoughts) are witnessed by me. I do not become absent if the
objects are absent. Sun sees planets around him. He sees them because of his
own light. He sees earth and other planets revolving around him. How stupid it
would be if the Sun said “I exist because planets exist”? Whose light is
enabling visibility of the planets? Thoughts are just like planets that I see.
I am not them. I can be without them. They can’t be without me. Sun can be
without planets. Planets can’t be without the Sun. I am self-luminous. I don’t
need evidence by the objects around me for my existence. I don’t need body or
the mind to prove that I exist. I simply Am.
Self Realization then, must be
the nearest thing, most obvious thing, simplest thing. What can be more nearer
to me than my own Self? Who is it that is trying for realization? The very fact
that I am trying means that I am aware of my Self. If I am aware, then that
means I know my self. If I know that ‘I Am’ then that means Self is already
realized. Then why so much of commotion and fuss about spirituality and
Self-Realization?!
Because I think I am not
Self-Realized. I think I am a body, very strongly. I, being the pure infinite awareness,
want to search for it in the distant skies. I think Self-Realization is like
completing an MBA degree. I think it requires a lot of effort. I think it is a
thing to be ‘attained’. But I immediately forget the fact that if something is
attained then it can be lost as well! So, in that case Self-Realization becomes
a temporary thing. Then what is the use of such realization? Thus, it cannot be
a thing to be attained. It must already be there, always.
Even if I call it as God, how
can God be a complicated entity? If it is a complicated entity, then how can it
be God? It must be the simplest, most straightforward, most unassuming thing of
all. What could that be? The very thing that is asking the question! ‘I’! ‘I’
am the subject that is always ignored in the maze of objects. The subject, me,
without which all objects lose meaning. The researcher, that searches
everything and defines everything, including the body and all its organs, but
forgets to define himself, the source self. Like the Restless Robot!
The below set of statements
best explains the irony. One set is by a spiritual aspirant and another by a
wave of an ocean.
I – “I need to get
Self-Realized”
Wave – “I need to get
ocean-realized”
I – “Self Realization is so
difficult. When will I attain God?”
Wave – “Ocean-realization is
so difficult. When will I attain the ocean?”
I – “What? I am already God? How
can it be! Impossible! I am so limited” (showing the body)
Wave – “What? I am already the
ocean? How can it be? Impossible! I am so tiny” (showing the form and shape of
the wave)
I – “Oh God, where are you?
Why are you not coming? Please guide me to Self Realization?”
Wave – “Oh Ocean, where are
you? When will you come and give me darshan?”
I – “Boo hooo… I am so
helpless, I am so weak. Please help me oh God… Boo hooo”
Wave – “Boo hooo… I am so
small and weak. When will you come to help me, ocean? Boo hooo”
The wave which is already the
ocean, thinks it is different, and hence wants to ‘attain’ ocean. How silly! Is
there anything to be attained by the wave to be ocean? Does the wave ‘become’
the ocean? Do I ‘become’ Self-Realized? So am I not aware of my self now? If
not, then what is asking this question?
Was anything required to be
done by the football player in the post ‘The Amazing Conversation’ to realize that
he is just playing a game?
Was any effort actually required
by the restless robot in the post ‘The Restless Robot’ to realize that it is
already that which it is searching for?
So, then what is the problem? Does
it mean that nothing needs to be done? No, finally it is only getting rid of
the notion that ‘I am’ a body. The notion is so deep that as soon as I utter ‘I’
it is immediately associated with the body. Then follows all the complexities
of the poor wave! What is this knot of wrong notion? Oh, the ego. This
nonexistent ego, which so assertively seems to exist, makes me feel miserable.
Then how to get rid of something
that is actually nonexistent? Ramana Maharshi - “Simple. Search for it. Since
it is nonexistent, it vanishes!”. What a genius solution! Search for the source
of the ‘I’, and the false ego automatically vanishes. Then what will remain is ‘I’
as it always is, without any attributes, names or forms. So my only effort is
to search for my source. The source of the sense of being ‘I’. When the wave
searches for its source, its false notion of individuality vanishes. Then what
remains is what remains. Pure being. The Ocean, majestic as it always is.
- Continued
Thank you for the wonderful example of wave and ocean! It simplifies it all so well...
ReplyDeleteDelightful! Every post in this blog brings the possibility of self realization closer and with it brings a lot of peace...
ReplyDeleteI am able to follow the whole series of thoughts...yes, I see the fact that the non existent ego makes me feel miserable. I know Mahrishi's famous, "Who am I?" question too...and tried many times already, but no answer, only headache comes, probably I don't know how to ask. Everybody says, it is simple and powerful technique, but, I don't get it properly. :(
ReplyDeleteIt is the easy and difficult simultaneously. Getting that question is difficult. The sentence 'Who Am I' doesn't carry much weight, it is the sense of "?" that accompanies the sentence matters. Reading Ramana's books will give some points. Some of the later posts in this blog may also help.
DeleteHere are my 2 cents . Maybe I am wrong ....Corrections are welcome
ReplyDeleteThe ego (Mamakar) is very much real and created in the mind . I would not think of it as non-existent . The problem is that this ego (which is in the mind) is superimposed on the consciousness and the mind starts thinking it itself is conscious. This is like the Moon which gets the light from the Sun but gets deluded into thinking it itself is luminous (which it is not) .The solution then would be to separate (remove the superimposition of) mind from consciousness . ThE whole thing is very subtle but Vital to realize the self .