<< Previous - Reconciling Jnana and Bhakti
Jnana Yoga only takes
up questions that are happily ignored although they are right in front of us, or
it analyzes the dumb answers given to certain questions that have been taken for
granted. There are several, and we will look at them one by one in the coming posts. This post deals with one of them.
The feeling of
awareness is always whole. There is nothing like '1/2 I Am' or '0.1 I Am'. This
existence 'I Am' is always whole. Now the question is this. Where within my
body is this feeling arising? If I say it is the brain as a whole, then, when a
part of the brain is cut out, then the 'I Am' awareness should reduce
proportionally. This is absurd. So, I will have to ask - where exactly in the
brain is this feeling arising? I want to pin point my Self, my being. Is it
arising in one of the billions of neural networks? So, am I just a mesh of 100-200
neurons? Is that my source being?
If I am a
combination of several neurons, then what is the difference between storing an
'apple' in a neural network and storing 'me'? Evidently I access all other
information. So, does it mean that one neural network is accessing all others?
Now that looks ridiculous. It is equivalent to saying that 'I Am' is a 100 line
computer program which is programmed to access/manage billion other programs!
Fantastic but foolish!
Also, if I am a
neural network in the brain, then I must have certainly pointed out myself as
being there. But no, I point towards the chest to say 'I Am'. I never point
towards the head when I say 'I Am'.
So, then, am I the
heart? I mean the organ heart? But that organ looks very dumb! It is just a
4-stroke pump. I am that?! No, no, I wish not! This pump cannot possibly be accessing
and managing all the information in the brain!
Then where the hell
am I? I am not able to pin point my Self! Sigh, I hope that a scientist will
one day be able to pin point 'awareness' in the body. Wait, What? I need
another person to tell me where I am? This is absolutely outrageous. 'I' is not
able to pinpoint its own location! All the intellectual arguments above is only
to prove that intellect cannot give any answer. Now this has become an enquiry.
A sense of "?" about its own source. Generate this "?" (related
to 'Where Am I') when you say 'I Am'. This is another "?" that can
grow strong over time.
Where Am I?
FYI - Along with 'Who Am I', this is another powerful enquiry that was suggested by Ramana Maharshi to seekers.
the problem lies in the assumption that "I am" exist. we only notice a thought that say it exist. this thought is false. also the thought that there is a brain is false. only entire reality as a all exist. every molecule/atom/sub atom/quantum wave/probability phenomena in what we call body is influenced by all reality - timeless influence. No I.
ReplyDeleteCorrect. 'I am' as feeling/thought is false. Enquiring about its source is the key to the reality which you point out.
Delete"I am" is a word, notion. one can instead sacrifice his identification with individuality. what is left ? "the ALL'. I am this ALL ... I even do not mind what is this ALL ... its properties etc. ... strong conviction is the key. strong conviction about being the ALL - no curiosity about ALL. the ALL just is ALL. this is the state before taking birth and after body departure.
ReplyDeleteGlad to see your deeply contemplative words :)
Delete